| Chapter I: A Critical Note on the Propriety and Legality of the Vodafone's Notice to the Govt. of India |
|
| VODAFONE cannot invoke BIT to foreclose
the Parliamentary action in TAX Matters |
1 |
| Taxation matters cannot come within a BIT on
Constitutional Principles |
2-4 |
| The jurisdiction of the territorial courts cannot be excluded |
4-6 |
| The so-called international arbitration is a farce in which
the corporate call the tune |
6-8 |
| As I read on the wall: the BITS may be turned into bits. |
9-10 |
| |
|
| Chapter II: A NOTE justifying the proposed retrospective
amendments in the Income-tax Act, 1961 in the context of
the Vodafone Judgement |
|
Introduction
The corporocratic intervention in our sovereign domestic space |
1-3 |
| Retrospective legislation is constitutionally sound,
economically justified, and morally apt. |
3-8 |
| Corporate intrusion into the matters within sovereign
domestic jurisdiction is impermissible |
8-12 |
| FDI: the issue is irrelevant |
12-15 |
| VODAFONE: Its profile of facts, its dexterous choreograph but Hazardous consequence |
15-20 |
| Vodafone's Strategies can be clearly seen |
20-22 |
| The Realm of Darkness |
22-23 |
| The Cayman Islands |
23 |
| The Virgin Islands |
27 |
| The goings-on in the Caribbean |
27-28 |
| The proposed retroactive legal provisions would go a long way to correct our Supreme Court's misunderstanding/ rejection of certain constitutional fundamentals in the Vodafone Judgement for the larger good of people 2846 (Analysis of the ‘soft' and ‘hard' structures of Azadi Bachao, Vodafone and McDowell) |
28-46 |
Conclusion
HENCE, WHAT JUSTICE DEMANDS |
47-48 |
| Conclusion II |
49 |
| My Apology |
50 |
| ANNEX: A letter dated Jan. 30, 2012
Addressed to the F.M. |
(Separate pagination) |
